In this important collection, the editors argue that medieval philosophy is best studied as an interactive discussion between thinkers working on very much the same problems despite being often widely separated in time or place. Each section opens with at least one selection from a classical philosopher, and there are many points at which the readings chosen refer to other works that the reader will also find in this collection. There is a considerable amount of material from central figures such as Augustine, Abelard, Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham, as well as extensive texts from thinkers in the medieval Islamic world. Each selection is prefaced by a brief introduction by the editors, providing a philosophical and religious background to help make the material more accessible to the reader.
This edition, updated throughout, contains a substantial new chapter on medieval psychology and philosophy of mind, with texts from authors not previously represented such as John Buridan and Peter John Olivi.
“Basic Issues in Medieval Philosophy is currently the best textbook on medieval philosophy in any modern language. It is outstanding in its area because the topical approach underlines both the relationship medieval philosophers have with ancient philosophers and the specific debates in which they were engaged among themselves. The selection of texts, some of which have never before been translated, is excellent. Bosley and Tweedale provide us with a decisively philosophical access to philosophy in the Middle Ages that allows the reader to discover a variety of competing views. I can only recommend this fine volume.” — Martin Pickave, University of Toronto
Comments on the First Edition:
“Basic Issues in Medieval Philosophy is unquestionably the best available textbook in the field.” — Norman Kretzmann, Cornell University
TOPIC I : NECESSITY, CONTINGENCY, AND CAUSATION
- The four Causes
- Senses of the Necessary
- Causation, Chance, and Spontaneity
- Science and the Accidental
- Two Kinds of Existents
- Proof of the Necessary of Existence
- What is Possible of Existence is Necessary of Existence from something else
- Characteristics of the Necessary of Existence
- That God can only do what He does do
I.4. Al-Ghazali and Averroes
- Whether the First Cause is simple
- About the Natural Sciences
I.5. St. Thomas Aquinas
- How absolute Necessity can exist in Created Things
- That God does not will other things in a necessary way
- Difficulties in the Concept of Will
I.6. Siger of Brabant
- Commentary on Necessity
I.7. The Condemnation of 1277
- Extending God’s Power
I.8. Henry of Ghent
- The Finiteness of the World’s Past
I.9. John Duns Scotus
- Proof of a First Cause
- The First Cause causes contingently
- The Omnipotence of God
- Could God make things better than He does?
I.10. William of Ockham
- Essentially ordered Causes
- Can it be proved that there exists a first productive Cause?
- Can it be proved that there exists a first conserving Cause?
- Is God able to do Everything that it is possible for a Creature to do?
- Can God do things which He neither does do nor will do?
- Does not being able to do the Impossible belong to God before not being able to be done by God
belongs to the Impossible?
- Can God make a better world than this one?
TOPIC II : IS THERE AN INFINITELY PERFECT BEING?
- Why there must be an eternal Mover that is not itself in Motion
- The first Mover has no Size
- The Principle on which depend the Heavens and Nature
II.2. St. Anselm
- The Being “a greater than which cannot be thought”
II.3. Al-Ghazali and Averroes
- Can we prove that the First Being is incorporeal?
II.4. St. Thomas Aquinas
- God’s Existence is not self-evident to us
- The five Ways
- A Being which just is its own Existence
II.5. John Duns Scotus
- The first efficient Cause has infinite Power
- The Infinity of the most excellent Being
II.6. William of Ockham
- Why the first efficient Cause cannot be proved to have infinite Power
- Why it cannot be proven that the most perfect Being is infinite in Perfection
- Aristotle did not intend to prove the Infinity of the First Cause
TOPIC III : COULD THE WORLD BE ETERNALLY EXISTENT?
- Did Motion ever have a Beginning? Will it ever end?
III.2. St. Augustine
- What is Time?
- How Creatures have always been but are not co-eternal with God
III.3. Al-Ghazali and Averroes
- Is the Doctrine of the “Philosophers” as regards the Production of the World coherent?
III.4. Moses Maimonides
- Arguments of the Mutakallemim purporting to show that the Universe was created out of nothing
- Different views on the Eternity of the Universe among those who believe God exists
- That the Universe is eternal has not been proven
- The view that God has produced the Universe from all Eternity and how it is to be evaluated
III.5. St. Thomas Aquinas
- That it is not necessary for Creatures to have existed always
- That God could have created an eternal World
III.6. Henry of Ghent
- That a created thing cannot have existed from Eternity
- Contradictions involved in the view that God makes eternal things
III.7. John Duns Scotus
- Arguments on both sides and their Refutations
III.8. William of Ockham
- Could God make a World that has existed from Eternity?
TOPIC IV: DETERMINISM, FREE WILL, AND DIVINE FOREKNOWLEDGE
- Determinism and the Truth of future contingent Statements
- How can God know everything about the Future?
IV.3. St. Anselm
The Harmony of Foreknowledge and Free Will
IV.4. St. Thomas Aquinas
- Does God’s Knowledge extend to Future Contingents?
IV.5. Siger of Brabant
- How Contingency arises in the World
IV.6. John Duns Scotus
- How God can know Future Contingents by knowing His own Will
IV.7. William of Ockham
- Why Scotus’s Solution will not work
- Propositions in the Present tense but about the Future
TOPIC V: IDENTITY AND DISTINCTION
- Senses of ‘same’
- Senses of ‘One’
- How the Motion of the Agent is the same as the Motion in the Recipient, yet different
- Sameness and Difference in the Trinity
- How to have many Persons in one God
V.4. John Duns Scotus
- Qualified and unqualified Distinctions
V.5. William of Ockham
- No formal Distinction without Real Distinction
TOPIC VI : UNIVERSALS AND PARTICULARS
- A World based on Archetypes
- Categories and the things there are
- Universals and Particulars
- The Problem of Universals
- Are first Principles Universals?
- Substance and Universals
- The five “Predicables”
- The “deeper Questions”
VI.5. Garlandus Compotista
- The Predicables are just Utterances
- The Existence and the Nature of Universals
- Universals and Signification
- What Propositions signify
- The Nature of Universals
- The Essences of things
VI.8. John Duns Scotus
- Natures are not of themselves individuated
- What makes a Substance individual
- Is a Universal something in things?
VI.9. William of Ockham
- Universals and Distinction
- The Distinction of First and Second Intentions
- The Synonymy of Concrete and Abstract Nouns
- Is a Universal a Singular?
- Is every Universal a Quality of the Mind?
- Is a Category made up of things outside the Mind or of Concepts of Things?
TOPIC VII : SKEPTICISM
VII.1. St. Augustine
- Arguments against Academic Skepticism
- Internal Knowledge
- Can we know there is something above Human Reason?
VII.2. Henry of Ghent
- Knowledge requires Divine Illumination of the Mind
VII.3. Siger of Brabant
- Some Judgments are to be trusted
VII.4. John Duns Scotus
- Refutation of Henry and of Skepticism generally
VII.5. Nicholas of Autrecourt
- Certainty and the Principle of Non-Contradiction
TOPIC VIII : VIRTUE AND REASON, SIN AND SEX
- Excellence (Virtue) and the Mean
- Ethics and Deliberation
VIII.2. St. Augustine
- What is the Supreme Good for Human Beings?
- The Ultimate Good is not to be found in this Life
- How Order pervades everything
- The Works of Reason
- Why Adultery is evil
- Lust, a Penalty for the Original Sin
- What Sin and Vice consist in
VIII.5. St. Thomas Aquinas
- Goodness and Badness in outward Acts
- Is Pleasure bad?
- Is Enjoyment in the Thought of Fornication a Sin?
- Why Lechery is a Sin
- Sex in the Garden of Eden
TOPIC IX: THE “DARKNESS WHICH IS BEYOND INTELLECT”
- The One that is the Source of Being
- The Intelligence and its Relation to the Soul
IX.2. Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite
- The Transcendent Good
- How God can be called Wisdom
- The Mystical Theology
- The Divine Darkness
IX.3. John Scotus Eriugena
- Things that are and things that are not
- God as Hyper-being
- God’s Diffusion into all things
- The Return of the Many to the One
- The three Motions of the Soul
- The Indefinability of God
- The Self-creation of the Divine Darkness
- Man contains all Creatures
- The Return of all things to God
IX.4. Ibn Tufail
- The Experience of total Self-annihilation
IX.5. Meister Eckhart
- On the Names of God
- “God is One”
- The Intellect perceives God bare of Goodness and Being
- The “Negation of Negation”
- The Attraction of the Soul to the One
- “On Detachment”
TOPIC X: BODY, SOUL, AND INTELLECT
- What sort of accounts should we give in psychology?
- Is there movement in the soul?
- What type of entity is the soul?
- What accounts for thinking and knowledge?
- Is the intellect formed in the process of fetal generation?
X.2. Alexander of Aphrodisias
- On the Intellect
- How to understand the potential and active intellects
- What does Aristotle’s definition of the soul tell us?
- Is the soul a substance?
- How do there come to be many individual human souls?
- Can the soul exist after the body has been destroyed?
- How does the human intellect come to know abstract essences?
- How does the intellect think?
- How does the soul relate to its powers?
- The nature of the material intellect
- The role of the agent intellect
X.6 Siger of Brabant and Thomas Aquinas
- How does the intellect unite with the body?
- Why the intellectual soul must be the form of the body
- Why the Averroists are wrong
- How Albert and Thomas go wrong
X.7 Peter John Olivi
- Why the human soul cannot be the form of the body
X.8. John Buridan
- In what way is the soul an actuality?
- How many souls does an individual have?
- Is the soul just its powers?
- How many powers does the soul have?
- Can the soul be spread throughout the body?
- Is the intellect passive as regards its objects?
- Can what knows something have the character of what it knows?
- Three theories about the intellect
Richard N. Bosley and Martin M. Tweedale are Professors Emeritus, Department of Philosophy at the University of Alberta.